Combining prevention and response interventions is essential for effective control in healthcare settings . Family/siblings or friends provided information for 7.0% (47 participants), while social media was a source for 6.8% (46 participants). Pharmacists were the second-most common source, consulted by 9.4% (63 participants). The mean knowledge score related to AR was 63.97 ≈ 64 (±8 SD, range ≈ 49). Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants.
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of antibiotic use among students in a Ghanaian tertiary institution
Participants scoring above 60% were deemed to have adequate KAP, whereas those at or below this threshold were categorized as having insufficient understanding or behaviors in antibiotic use. Knowledge-related questions were scored with a binary system, where incorrect or uncertain (“don’t know”) responses received a score of 0, while correct answers were awarded 1 point. Domains with less than 0.07 were reviewed carefully, and targeted questions were modified or deleted accordingly. It was piloted among 5% of the sample (35 students). Data collection was conducted from 4 September to 19 October 2023 by a team of trained students from the College of Medicine at AlMaarefa University, who followed standardized protocols for accuracy and consistency. This in-person approach ensured direct participant engagement, comprehensive responses, and efficient data collection.
Data Availability Statement
Focusing on non-medical students is critical, as they represent a high-risk demographic for antibiotic misuse due to their lack of formal medical training, potential role in shaping public health behaviors, and limited awareness of AR consequences. Similarly, Mostafa et al. (2021) found that Egyptian university students demonstrated low health literacy and limited knowledge about antibiotics, increasing the likelihood of misuse . Understanding public knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding antibiotics is essential for developing effective strategies to combat AR . The findings also reveal critical gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and practices among such students regarding antibiotic use. Overall, 77.3% demonstrated adequate knowledge, 67.4% positive attitudes, and 49.4% good practices toward antibiotic use.
3.2. Data Collection Instrument
Students may lack awareness of pharmacists’ expertise, highlighting an opportunity to diversify accessible, trusted healthcare sources for public education. However, expanding awareness to include pharmacists—equally qualified to educate on antibiotic use and resistance—is critical. Such contradiction is probably due to the inclusion in their sample with all age groups rather than a young population of university students . As depicted in Table 1, among the 672 participants involved in this study, the mean age of the students was 20.2 years ±standard deviation (SD) 1.8.
Developed the overall framework and methodology for this study. Policymakers must implement multifaceted interventions addressing healthcare and patient factors. Second, the cross-sectional design precludes establishing causal relationships or analyzing temporal trends between awareness and behavioral factors. This course could cover resistance mechanisms, global antimicrobial resistance (AMR) trends, and ethical considerations in engineering contexts (e.g., pharmaceutical waste management). Younger students (19–20 years) emerged as a critical subgroup requiring early intervention during their formative academic years. Collectively, the findings emphasize the need for targeted educational campaigns to improve antibiotic stewardship, addressing misconceptions and promoting responsible use within this population.
The aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and awareness of appropriate antibiotic use among university students. The study highlights persistent knowledge gaps about AR among non-medical university students in Riyadh, despite moderate general awareness. This study found that non-medical students at Riyadh universities demonstrate strong awareness of antibiotic use information sources, with 76% relying primarily on physicians—a rate markedly higher than the 38% observed among Malaysian university students . Our study revealed a lack of knowledge regarding the safe use of antibiotics and inadequate medical practices related to their consumption among the population.
Associated Data
However, 40.9% of students demonstrated insufficient knowledge, and factors such as age, gender, and field of study significantly impacted KAP outcomes. Addressing these issues should be prioritized as an antimicrobial stewardship strategy as these students are crucial, tentative frontliners in healthcare administration in the country. Misconceptions persisted, with 13.3% believing antibiotics treat viral infections and 44.2% considering all antibiotics safe. Using simple random sampling, 233 students were enrolled across five health programs. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among undergraduate students of the Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, from May–August 2024. University students in the Allied Health Sciences are uniquely positioned to influence patterns of antibiotic use, both as practitioners and educators.
- Amoxicillin was the most commonly reported antibiotic (65.7%).
- The findings also reveal critical gaps in knowledge, attitudes, and practices among such students regarding antibiotic use.
- This study provides vital data for public health initiatives and informs effective strategies to promote responsible antibiotic use.
- Further investigation into this demographic is essential for promoting responsible antibiotic stewardship and mitigating resistance on university campuses and beyond.
- Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses an urgent global health crisis, contributing to approximately 700,000 deaths worldwide annually.
- Similarly, Mostafa et al. (2021) found that Egyptian university students demonstrated low health literacy and limited knowledge about antibiotics, increasing the likelihood of misuse .
Proposed strategies include integrating AR education into university curricula, launching campus-wide campaigns (e.g., digital outreach, mandatory health literacy modules), and partnering with pharmacies to reinforce responsible practices. This suggests that the majority of participants had a moderate level of practice towards antibiotic use, similar to the reported findings from university student in Nepal and in line with the almost around the global average of 56%, according to the 2020 WHO survey . Overall, the study highlights the need for interventions to improve students’ understanding of AR and promote appropriate practices. However, nationality and university affiliation showed no significant associations across knowledge, attitude, or practice, with all p-values greater than 0.05. Specifically, 43% (289 out of 672) of the participants demonstrated an adequate understanding of antibiotic resistance, while the remaining 57% (383 out of 672) exhibited an inadequate knowledge of this topic. These behaviors increase the prevalence of resistant infections, leading to harder-to-treat diseases, higher healthcare costs, and increased outbreak risks on university campuses and within the broader community, posing a significant public health threat .
- All non-medical students in any public or private university in Riyadh, regardless of their nationalities, genders, or fields of study, were included, whereas visiting students or medical students were excluded from the study.
- Studies from England, Italy, and Cyprus highlight this trend, demonstrating that younger individuals report poorer antibiotic knowledge and higher misuse rates 15,16,17.
- Focusing on non-medical students is critical, as they represent a high-risk demographic for antibiotic misuse due to their lack of formal medical training, potential role in shaping public health behaviors, and limited awareness of AR consequences.
- Additional questions assessed understanding of antibiotic side effects and the perceived efficacy of alternative medicine as a substitute.
- Attitudes toward antibiotic use were evaluated through twelve questions, including statements such as trusting a physician’s decision when choosing not to prescribe antibiotics and avoiding unnecessary antibiotic use.
- Notably, students aged 19–20 demonstrated the highest rates of insufficient knowledge and unsafe behaviors compared to other age groups.
On the other hand, literary students had 52.2% lower odds of sufficient knowledge compared to sciences students. Notably, students aged 19–20 demonstrated the highest rates of insufficient knowledge and unsafe behaviors compared to other age groups. In terms of university affiliation, IMSU had the highest representation, with 54.0% of participants. Although the dataset contained minimal missing values, specifically about ten instances within the attitude assessment, mean imputation was employed to address these gaps. A 60% proficiency threshold—determined through pilot study analyses (mean and median of knowledge scores)—was adopted to assess adequacy across domains. Additional questions assessed understanding of antibiotic side effects and the perceived efficacy of alternative medicine as a substitute.
Al Nasser et al. (2021) reported that while people may possess some knowledge about antibiotics, they often exhibit negative attitudes toward their use . Antibiotic resistance has emerged as a critical global health challenge, driven by the widespread misuse and overuse of antibiotics, leading to the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), which significantly complicate treatment options 1,2. Additionally, the absence of clinical validation—such as prescription audits or medical records—may lead to overestimations of appropriate antibiotic practices Such initiatives would bridge technical expertise with public health priorities, positioning engineers as advocates for antibiotic stewardship. Collaborations with medical or public health faculties could foster interdisciplinary solutions, empowering engineers to design innovations (e.g., wastewater treatment systems) that mitigate AMR risks. For engineering students, who demonstrated higher baseline knowledge, introducing an elective course on antibiotic awareness could leverage their scientific literacy and problem-solving skills.
The effective sample size calculated was 334; however, a larger sample size of 501 students was eventually included in the study, yielding approximately 1.5 times the initial sample size projection (1.5 design effect). Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants, detailing the study’s purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits. These deficiencies in health literacy and antibiotic education underscore the urgent need for targeted educational interventions .
2. Study Design and Settings
As an integral and educated segment of society, students influence public health behaviors and community practices. A literature review identified only three studies on antibiotic KAP among healthcare students 9,10,11, with no published research on non-medical university students in Saudi Arabia 28,29,30. Public health campaigns should prioritize the 17–24 age group, as university students represent a pivotal demographic shaping health behaviors, yet are often excluded from antibiotic stewardship initiatives. Risky behaviors—such as self-medication and sharing antibiotics without prescriptions—were widespread, revealing a mismatch between partial awareness and actual practices 13,45,46,47,48,49.
The present study showed that university non-medical students’ practice toward antibiotic use was approximately 60.6%. This is https://www.betsomnia-nl.nl/ in contrast to other studies from Jordan, Thailand, Zambia, Brunei, Sudan, and Cyprus, where non-medical students exhibited lower levels of knowledge regarding antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance 20,21,23,24,25,26,28,29. Age significantly impacted antibiotic-related attitudes and practices among students. Level of knowledge, attitude, and practice toward AR among the university students. This scoring framework ensured consistency in evaluating participants’ antibiotic-related attitudes and practices, aligning with established methodologies to enhance reliability and comparability of results.
Other statements examined self-medication behaviors, such as taking antibiotics based on past similar symptoms (e.g., toothache, gastrointestinal issues), using expired antibiotics, or discontinuing antibiotic courses prematurely upon feeling better. Additional statements addressed misconceptions, including the use of antibiotics for viral conditions (e.g., colds, flu), pain relief, fever reduction, and availability as over-the-counter drugs. The attitude section had a possible score range of 12–60, while the practice section ranged from 18–90. The attitude and practice sections utilized a five-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree), with responses scored from 1 (least appropriate) to 5 (most appropriate). Three questions related to knowledge from the previous literature were found not appropriate to the local context and then not included in the final version of the questionnaire. A structured, paper-based, self-administered questionnaire—designed based on validated instruments from prior studies 16,31,34,35,36,37,38—was distributed as printed copies to target participants across multiple university campuses.
